In comparing Kantian ethics and
utilitarian ethics it becomes clear that both theories have plausible
arguments. However, utilitarianism is
the only viable argument for guiding moral judgment and behavior. Kantian ethics stresses the part of the individual
and emphasizes that all people are autonomous and capable of making their own
decisions. Kant’s Categorical Imperative
further explains his ideas for moral behavior by essentially restating the
Golden Rule, which is to treat others as you want to be treated. While simple and appealing in message, this
idea is much more difficult to apply than utilitarianism. Utilitarianism includes the Greatest
Happiness Principal or considering the greatest good for the greatest number
when making difficult moral or ethical decisions. As harsh as utilitarianism may sound when
decisions have to be made that would include the sacrifice of some for the
betterment of most, it is the theory that best supports morality and living in
a more just society.
If eleven people are stranded on
an island and a rescue helicopter holds space for only nine with only enough
fuel for one trip, it seems that saving nine is a more moral choice than
sacrificing eleven. Or if a classroom teacher
has a class with thirty students and two of those students continually
misbehave and disrupt the class at the expense of the rest of the class’
instructional time, doesn’t it seem that the looking out for the 28 and finding
alternative instruction for the other two is the most sound idea. Another example is the use of
vaccinations. Is it okay for school-
aged children not to be vaccinated against contagious diseases because it goes
against one parents’ religion or personal beliefs? Is it really okay to expose all of those
children to dangerous diseases because of the autonomy of one?
An
utilitarian theory exemplified using the Barbara Method is:
1. Egalitarian
acts are morally good.
2. Self
sacrifices are egalitarian acts.
3. Therefore,
all self sacrifices are morally good.
I really like your extensive analysis of both beliefs in real-world situations. The vaccination example was pretty good. However, it's been repeatedly stated that Kantian ethics are, in fact, not The Golden Rule.
ReplyDelete