Affirmative action is a subject matter based solely upon an
attempt at eliminating racial biasing and achieving equality for all through
opportunity. Yet, each individual circumstance in which the principles of
affirmative action would serve justice should be handled within its own realm.
The concepts that a race learns better from their own kind, or gender vis-à-vis,
should not be a determining factor in fulfilling a position. This then allows
the gender or race in itself to become a quality worth considering for
competence and more so proficiency, which further reinforces the discord
affirmative action was put in place to eliminate. Consequently, the social
concept that the race of a figure or model can affect societies outlook on the
adequacies of that racial group must be considered. Simply put, people that
fill an esteemed role or position become a representative of their own heritage
and culture. For this fact affirmative action can accept morality only under
certain variations, which are:
-Ensuring an adequate pool of historically oppressed
applicants and
-Giving preferences to historically oppressed applicants if
they’re equally qualified with other top candidates, better known as the
Tiebreaker model.
Any other alternatives to affirmative action must be
denounced due to their unethical behavior. To overlook the quality of an
individual in favor of their race, heritage, or culture can and will pass for
racial discrimination, regardless of what end of the racial spectrum it is
acting on. Affirmative action should not consume any enterprise or industrial
entity as its primary concern and should only be considered after all other
factors of the employees’ expectations.
No comments:
Post a Comment