The societies in which we are
raised play a key role in shaping our identities. However, to say that our societies are
what define us is a bit drastic. Societies
set the groundwork for our development.
Some people dedicate themselves to the ways of their society, while
others choose to steer in the opposite direction, creating a contrasting
persona to that of their society. I was
raised by very open parents. Two of the
most important things my parents drilled into my head as a child were open
mindedness and acceptance. My parents
aren’t particularly religious, but from the get-go I was taught to respect and
be accepting of religion and was encouraged to explore religions IF I
wanted. This idea of being open minded
and accepting has played a huge part in who I am and how I look at things
today. With this simple base provided by
my parents I was able to discover the ways of different cultures and develop an
opinion of those encounters that was completely my own. A major defining piece of my identity that I
created is my love for sports. As a
child I tried out A LOT of things, anything feasible that I wanted to try out,
my parents supported me. I tried acting
and several musical instruments, but when I got into soccer, basketball and
softball I knew I was where I belonged.
My love for being a part of a team, pushing myself, and excelling in a
sports game is something that came naturally and has taken up 16 years of my
life. Nevertheless, I don’t consider
sports to be a massive determining factor in my identity. I think what defines me as a person is
perspective and how I handle real life situations. My strong opinions and views of life are
things that I developed on my own through growth and experience. What I think and what I do is ultimately who
I am.
I’m
the type of person that just wants to help everyone. If a stranger is in need and I’m able to help
them, I will. I personally feel like I
have a responsibility for others on a human to human level, but to expect this
type of behavior from everyone is unrealistic and unnecessary. Moral responsibility has almost entirely to
do with relationships. If a person has a
solid relationship with another person they become morally responsible for that
person, friend or relative. To go the
extra mile of assuming moral responsibility for a stranger is admirable but not
something to be morally expected to any extent.
For example, someone who had horrible biological parents and has
absolutely no relationship with them should not be morally responsible for them. Relationships are complex and more than just being around a person. When you have a
relationship with someone you care about them and they become a part of you in
a sense, so if there is no relationship there’s no real moral basis of why you
should be responsible for them.
It's great that you declared that your parents are as very open minded individuals. It definitely gives the reader a hint of the oncoming argument. However I don't see much of an argument towards your initial claims. You were fortunate to have the means to try all these sports and activities. But what about the rest? ... This is something that wasn't address in your argument.
ReplyDeleteAs for the second half, this is something that most can agree on.