The
idea of moral luck questions if external conditions outside of ones control,
should be used to increase or decrease blame or praise of the individual. An example of this in my life would be when I
was 16 and my friend and I attended a driving education course. We went to the same classes together and got
the same exact education. We also had
the same problem where neither of us knew how to parallel park. When the time came for the test, we ended up
getting different proctors. I ended up
not having to parallel park for the test; my friend on the other hand was not
so lucky. His proctor made him parallel
park and because of it he ended up failing.
This is an example of moral luck because we both had the same exact
knowledge and training going into it, and it came down to bad luck that he
ended up failing.
While
I do believe that moral luck does exist in our lives, I do not believe that it
is a serious ethical problem. Luck is
something that is out of our control and can be random; therefore one should
not be blamed or praised for this. We
cannot stop these things from happening.
It would not be ethical to blame or praise someone for an action that
they cannot control. In the example I
showed I it could have been prevented with no need for luck, had we just
learned to Parallel Park in the first place.
Mike, your definition of moral luck is correct and on point. Your example of moral luck is good but I think it is more of a case of bad luck. I agree with you feeling moral luck is not a major ethical problem.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your view on moral luck. I agree with your statement that moral luck does exist but its not an ethical issue. Your agreement makes a lot of sense. Luck is something that is out of our control so we can't give blame or praise to something we don't control.
ReplyDelete