Moral Luck
Damon Land
Moral luck is basically when blame
or punishment is placed on someone based on something they cannot control. An
example of this in my life would be of me texting on my cell phone while
driving. A cop sees me, and I’m pulled over, and ticketed. However, I could
have been texting on my phone, accidently hit a pedestrian, killing them, and
then being charged for vehicular manslaughter. I’m lucky in the sense that
though my intensions were the same (in texting while driving), I only dealt
with the consequences of a ticket, instead of vehicular manslaughter.
I do believe that moral luck is a
serious ethical problem because a person can be punished on things they haven’t
done. An example of this would be an attempted murder. Without knowing a
person’s true intentions, how can an attempted murderer be punished? Should
they be punished as a murderer, or not punished at all, since no crime was
committed, or somewhere in the middle?
I also personally believe that moral
luck is a problem because it is basically either punishing someone for praised
for something they have no control over. If someone is born with athletic
capabilities, why should they be praised over someone without athletic
capabilities? This form of moral luck (circumstantial), shows that people do
not have control over every aspect of their life. Another example is if someone
is born into a poor nation. While people can make the best out of their
situations, it does not change the fact that someone born into riches will be treated
better than someone born into slums, yet both people had no control of where
they were born.
No comments:
Post a Comment